The charts show how tourism to two countries changed over a 50-year period
The pie charts illustrate the comparison between the number of tourists coming to Australia and Germany between 1960 and 2010.
In the overview, there was a complete turnabout while in 1960, Australia was most favoured by European tourists however just after a 50-year period, Asia tourism to Australia made up the largest part in even the greater proportion. For Germany, from 1960 to 2010 there was no major change and considered as the most popular tourist destination to neighbouring nations.
In 1960, the main tourism to Australia was Europe, which accounted for more than a half, 5 times higher in comparison with Asia, and Britain is the second significant source at 25%. However, the percentage of European travellers plummeted and hit the lowest part of only one in ten. Oppositely, the Asian travellers had a remarkable surge to 63% after 5 decades.
Regarding Germany, the European and British visitors both made up the greatest proportion in 1960 and 2010, which accounted for 65% and more than two fifths respectively. Moreover, USA tourism to Germany remains stable at approximately a quarter whereas the number of Asian tourists increased gradually from a tenth to 25%.
- Many children these days have an unhealthy lifestyle. Both schools and parents are responsible for solving this problem. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 61
- Some people think that renewable energy sources like solar and wind power should replace fossil fuels such as coal and gas as soon as possible Others think we should continue to use fossil fuels while it is still cheap to do so Discuss both these views an 95
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 73
- The charts show how tourism to two countries changed over a 50-year period 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16062176166 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81167224598 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585492227979 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9456268729 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.5 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104582759764 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385530463349 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356429252908 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0581526354917 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350728226309 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.