The charts below show the donation given to six different types of charity by one company from 2012 to 2014. Summarizes the information by slecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar charts give information about the donation from one company to charity in 3 years.
Overall, the donation from one company for social welfare was highest among six areas. Meanwhile, the charity for arts was lowest in six different types. However, it’s can be see clearly if we look at the specific decline.
Look at the bar chart in 2012. It can be seen that, the rate of donation for charity for social welfare was highest among six areas about 23%. Meanwhile, three types including education, environment and health have the same percentage about 8% and 7%. Finally, the lowest in six types is wildlife and arts about 2%. So, we can conclude that in this year the company want support more in education and social more than others.
Look at the bar chart in 2013 and 2014. It can see the percentage have many changes between 2012 and 2013, social welfare was still highest but lower than past year from 23% to 16%. Meanwhile, education, environment and health are still didn’t had many changes ( 6,5,7%). For wildlife and arts about 4% and 3%. In the last year is 2014, social welfare has significantly increased from 15% to 25%. In constant, education, environment and health about 8,6,9%. Finally, wildlife and arts about 5% and 4%. So,it can be seen that that company always want to support more in social or other likes environment of health more than wildlife and arts. The rate in three year didn’t had many changes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-11 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
- The pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 67
- The bar chart give information about people living in Australia and living outside Australia in urban rural and countryside from 1995 to 2010 67
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 56
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Some people think that should bailiwick the science of food and how to compose it Others think th 61
- Although there is a lot of translation software available learning a language could still be advantageous To what extent do you agree or disagree 44
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 245, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'didn't' requires base form of this verb: 'have'.
Suggestion: have
...environment and health are still didn’t had many changes 6,5,7%. For wildlife and ...
^^^
Line 4, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...health are still didn’t had many changes 6,5,7%. For wildlife and arts about 4% a...
^^
Line 4, column 503, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: ,
...y, wildlife and arts about 5% and 4%. So,it can be seen that that company always ...
^
Line 4, column 653, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun year seems to be countable, so consider using: 'three years'.
Suggestion: three years
...ore than wildlife and arts. The rate in three year didn’t had many changes.
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 671, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'didn't' requires base form of this verb: 'have'.
Suggestion: have
...and arts. The rate in three year didn’t had many changes.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, look, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1191.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.764 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36054569962 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 8.94146341463 201% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.7091560406 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 66.1666666667 112.824112599 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.8888888889 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.72222222222 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165068129966 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626675213516 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724754098663 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156300729269 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811851689524 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.43 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.