The charts show information about the number of kilometers travelled in an average month and the distribution of vehicle types in Britain

The provided line graph and two pie charts illustrate the detailed information about the number of kilometers travelled for the three purposes and the percentage of the five types of vehicles used in Britain respectively.
At first glance, while the 1990-2010 period witnessed a considerable change in the figure for average distance travelled belonged to the three purposes, the distribution of vehicle types seemed minimally changed in this period.
As can be seen from the line graph, the remaining just under 8000 kilometers was allocated to the number of kilometers used for commuting in the UK in the period of five years, after a considerable upturn of approximately 1500 kilometers in this figure between 1990 and 1993. Then, from 1998 to 2010, there was a dramatic decrease of nearly 6000 kilometers in this number. After a slight fluctuation, in 2010, the number of kilometers used for transport stood at the same figure in 1990, at just over 3000 kilometers. Also, the number of personal distance rose minimally by 300 kilometers during this period of time.
Turn to the two pie charts, the percentage of cars used ranked first among the five types of vehicles between 1990 and 2010, at 63% and 59% respectively. The figure for trucks used in Britain, which formed 30%, stood at a significant part out of the five types. Meanwhile, there were inconsiderable data in the percentage of buses, motorcycles and other, which accounted for 5%, 3% and 3% in order in 2010.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 601, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...minimally by 300 kilometers during this period of time. Turn to the two pie charts, the perce...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1235.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82967279742 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506072874494 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 376.2 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.2546038403 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.222222222 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4444444444 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236097716596 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101426158072 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928615784545 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166831789904 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106453257473 0.0819641961636 130% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.