The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009.
Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare the principal means of transportation used by people to commute to an unknown university in two years.
It is noticeable that car was the most popular mode of transportation in 2004 while bus was dominant in 2009.
As can see from the graph, in 2004, car was chose by over half of the commuters. As a result of paying fees for car parking in the university in 2006, there was a decline in the proportion of people using it to 28%. When new bus stop was constructed in the university in 2008, the percentage of commuters opting bus for transportation increased significantly...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-02 | Drragkloha | 66 | view |
- The diagrams below show the development of a small fishing village and its surrounding area into a large European tourist resort Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not in others. Some people therefore think that government should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society; those who choose to study less relevant subjects sh 78
- The diagrams below show the stages in the development of simple cooking equipment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisos where relevant 85
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money This practice can act as an incentive for some but may have a negative impact on others To what extent is this style of management effectiv 87
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in differnt countries in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisos where relevant 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 45, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'chosen'.
Suggestion: chosen
...an see from the graph, in 2004, car was chose by over half of the commuters. As a res...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 808.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56497175141 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90354808205 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610169491525 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.5255794394 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7777777778 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180551855373 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069441360923 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032311613765 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106671370213 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165914842241 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.