Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development?
It is undoubted that the world today has become a global village. One of the effects of this is that it is likely for people all over the world using the same language. From my point of view, there are both positive and negative effects.
On the one hand, international language has had positive influence on business, education and social life. Firstly, cooperation between companies in different countries would be able much more convenient when communication in international business meeting using the similar language. Secondly, it is obviously easier to access to many sources of important textbooks and journals in a wide range of fields such as technology, science. Finally, the availability of the dominant language can also lead to the better chances to enlarge the network of friends. People will be less likely to be isolated when travelling to other countries as they can interact with the locals.
On the other hand, these developments can be extremely negative. A language is much more than simple means of communication; it has a vital connection with the cultural identity of the people who speak it. There are a variety of myths, legends, traditional and cultural activities which are passing over the next generation using their own language, as many tribes have no written literature. Therefore, if national languages do extinct, a whole way of life will disappear with it, and we will lose the rich cultural diversity that makes societies more interesting.
In conclusion, it seems to me that global language has certainly revolutionized communication , but not all of the outcomes of this development have been positive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-26 | Yamin_j | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-20 | hieutrungpham7201 | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-12 | gianggiangvn | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | quynhhuong656 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-05 | miminguyen | 73 | view |
- The diagrams below show the stages in the development of simple cooking equipment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisos where relevant 85
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money This practice can act as an incentive for some but may have a negative impact on others To what extent is this style of management effectiv 87
- Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not in others. Some people therefore think that government should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society; those who choose to study less relevant subjects sh 78
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 52
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in differnt countries in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisos where relevant 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s certainly revolutionized communication , but not all of the outcomes of this dev...
^^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... revolutionized communication , but not all of the outcomes of this development have been ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21428571429 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98221429453 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609022556391 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5800361746 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.692307692 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153347059737 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481720194135 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385984568861 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0891244381457 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299729876855 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.