The charts show the percentages of family income spent in different categories in South Korea and Singapore in the years 2000 and 2020.
The given pie charts provide a comparison of various services which were purchased by family salary in South Korea and Singapore in 2000 and 2020.
From an overall perspective, one particularly interesting fact highlighted that the share of housing hosted the major proportion in both countries regardless of period. Noticeably, the spending for most of the categories witnessed an upward trend whereas the reversed pattern should be observed for food and other services.
Taking a first look at the South Korea diagram, it is obvious that disbursement for housing accounted for more than one-fifth in 2000 and increased by 10 percent after 20 years. Subsequently, the percentage of spending wages on transport raised from 20 percent in 2000 to 25 percent in 2020. Following that, the income consumed for the healthcare program made a threefold jump over a 20-year period. However, the family salary allocated for food was down by 4 percent and other categories roughly decrease by more than 20 percent between the two periods.
Moving to the Singapore pie chart, it is evident that payments for housing occupied more than one-third of family salary in 2000 and increase by 6 percent over 20 years. Next, the amount of income purchased for transport and health care system in Singapore was up to 2 times when compared with the initial percentage. Nevertheless, the number of wages paid for food and other programs decline by 11 percent and 8 percent respectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1229.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12083333333 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80413571058 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.6746700083 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 122.9 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207693932236 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087136524871 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815101011434 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146101161722 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0990274225479 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.