The pie chart illustrates data on the differences in electricity production categorized into three distinct sources in several nations from 2003 to 2008, measured in percentage.
Overall, it is clear that fossil fuel and hydro power were mainly used for the electricity industry in India and Sweden respectively. Meanwhile, Morocco and Vietnam favored fossil fuel and hydro power over nuclear power.
More specifically, nuclear power was the least common source of Indian electricity production, which accounted for only 4% of the entire industry. This contrasts sharply with the use of fossil fuel, with roughly four-fifths of electricity production. Meanwhile, hydro power and nuclear power made up 52% and 44% of the Swedish electricity industry respectively.
On the other hand, Morocco mainly focused on exploiting hydro power, contributing 95% to the electricity industry, which was over twice that of Vietnam, with only 44%. Fossil fuel, however, witnessed the opposite trend with only 5% in Morocco as opposed to 56% in Vietnam.
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In many countries plastic bags are the main source of rubbish causing pollution in oceans and on land therefore they should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The chart shows the percentage of car manufacturer’s total car sales in different regions from 2006 to 2010. 78
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged Others believe that children who are taught to co operate rather than compete become more useful adults Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and I 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5375 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91094379025 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60625 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7398357185 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.75 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100611535187 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491215429888 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456345340266 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0735620217833 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470547765 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.