The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The four given pie charts illustrate how electricity was produced by 3 different sources in India, Sweden, Morocco, and Vietnam in 2003 and 2008. Overall, fossil fuel was used the most in generating electricity in Vietnam and India while it is hydropower in Sweden and Morocco.
According to the first and fourth chart, in 2003, Indian and Vietnamese exploited most fossil fuel sources for electric production, which accounted for 82% and 56% respectively. At the same time, hydropower was also the second main sources in the Vietnamese electric industry (at 44%) whilst it accounted for only 14% in India. It is nuclear power which was a minor source in electric production in India (4%).
Turning to the two remain charts, hydropower accounted for the highest proportion in both Sweden and Morocco at 52% and 95% respectively. Meanwhile, in Sweden, nuclear power played a significant role in electric producing in Sweden with 44% usage. By contrast, fossil fuel was not popular in both the Swedish and Moroccan electric industry.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...den Morocco and Vietnam in 2003 and 2008 Overall fossil fuel was used the most in...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96428571429 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74664813249 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505952380952 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 168.0 22.4926829268 747% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 834.0 112.824112599 739% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 168.0 22.9334400587 733% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 34.0 5.23603664747 649% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157899080734 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157899080734 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115405472556 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314563037206 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 85.9 13.2329268293 649% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -90.58 61.2550243902 -148% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 67.6 10.3012195122 656% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.67 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 14.98 8.06136585366 186% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 11.4329268293 499% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 69.2 10.9970731707 629% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.