The graph compared the amount of money used for entertaining activities by Asian, European and American in 1995 and 2000.
Overall, the two most popular activities were publishing and television in both of three regions with a converse expenditure for cinema and video activities. Besides, people in the USA were prone to spend much more on amusements than Asian and European at the same time.
Firstly, from 1995 to 2000, people in the three mentioned areas tended to spend their money on publishing and television as the numbers always accounted for more than 80 per cent in entertainment spending. On the other hand, going to the cinema and making videos for amusement seemed to be unattractive activities in these three regions because only 5-10% of the expenditures were used for them.
Secondly, in 1995, the American spent 184 for entertainment whereas the figure in Asia and Europe were only 67 and 97 respectively. In 2000, while the expenditure level of all regions increased significantly, American spending was also the highest with 257, compares to 110 and 131 of Asian and European.
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honeybee
- Some people think that art is essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time 84
- The graph below shows the US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services
- The table below shows the sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday 78
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08839779006 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83977900552 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585635359116 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7968390712 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.571428571 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8571428571 5.23603664747 246% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0745259493004 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410545412653 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442370472804 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0588364685971 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464378578108 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.