The given circular chart depicts the information about the product of Fossil fuel, Hydropower and Nuclear power in various countries from 2003 to 2008.
Looking at overall, it is clear that the highest data in India and Vietnam nation, meanwhile the lowest electricity in Sweden and Morocco.
According to the first and fourth chart, in 2003, Indian and Vietnamese exploited fossil fuel sources for electric production, which account for 82% and 56% respectively. At the same time, hydropower was also the second main sources in the Vietnamese electric industry (at 44%) whilst it accounted for only 14% in India. It is nuclear power which was a minor source in electric production in India.
Turning to the two left charts, Hydropower accounted for the highest proportion in both Sweden and Morocco at 52% and 95% respectively. Meanwhile, in Sweden, nuclear power played a significant role in electric producing in Sweden with 44% usage. By contrast, fossil fuel was not popular in both the Swedish and Moroccan electric industry.
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1950 and 2002 and projections for 2050
- As countries develop people tend to buy more and more cars Do you thing the advantages for the individual outweigh the disadvantages for the environment 56
- These days many of us prefer to throw damaged things away whereas in the past people used to repair damaged items and keep them for a long time Explain why you think this change has happened What are the effects of this change in attitude 61
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table shows the proportion of income spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20958083832 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72189776723 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586826347305 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7024304561 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.75 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157363085783 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714109609793 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473900656257 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0957653693844 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549137148444 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.