It is irrefutable that wild animals a crucial role in the world. In the modern era, some people believe that in the world no place for a wild animal in 21- century and care for the waste of money. I agree with this notion and will explain my view in the following paragraphs.
To commence with the favour of notion, there are abundant factors behind the standpoint for a wild animal. Nowadays, the majority of people are retrospect and they believe that wild animal dangerous like tiger and lion. So they are not thought about the care of the animal. Owing to this enormous kind of animal diminish in the world, despite merely of human. Resultingly, it is a bad impact on the world phenomenon. Meanwhile, the upcoming generation will have less information about the animal.
To embark with, there are numerous factors behind of less protection of the animal. However, the government should that the establishment more of the zoo and work in the world instead of it is merely placed provide to protection and safety for people and animal. For example, the built park and garden in Chandigarh and Amritsar, there visit enormous people with infants. This, it is more beneficial that firstly provides safety, in addition to tremendous knowledge for upcoming infants.
To sum up, wild protection more important in day to day human lives. We can not neglect the benefit of animal, which provides of the human.
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1950 and 2002 and projections for 2050
- Advertising influences people to buy things such as clothes and shoes What are the problems caused by that What solutions can be given 73
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 38
- The diagram below shows the percentage of share of total world production of wheat by Asia Europe and other part of the world from the years 1840 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rel 75
- Governments in many countries have recently introduced special taxes on foods and beverages with high levels of sugar Some think these taxes are a good idea while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, so, while, for example, in addition, kind of, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1172.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 241.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86307053942 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55933529231 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 176.041082164 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51867219917 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 373.5 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0952748339 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.1333333333 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0666666667 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156757199787 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511698790809 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493378517848 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991642506187 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629161145935 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.