The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple-producing countries in 2009 and 2019, and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts illustrate the world export data of pineapples in three countries that were on the top of producing in a decade from 2009 to 2019, and indicate the total cost of each fruit when being bought by consumers in 2019.
Overall A was the country that produced the most quantity of pineapples while country C was the counterpart. It is clear that in total 7 categories of the cost each pineapple, distribution and retail made up the highest amount of money.
In 2009, the number of pineapples exported was about 1 million tonnes, which was not half as high as this figure for country B. However, over a span of 10 years, five times as many pineapples were exported by country A than country B. Regarding country C, the figure for this country was at the bottom of the list, at around under 1 million tonnes in this decade.
If we look at the breakdown of the cost to buyers each pineapple, the distribution and retail costs were the most expensive, accounting for a third of total cost while the percentage of export costs were just 4%. The second highest cost was the profit to retailers, followed by the taxes, at 18% and 16% respectively. The import licences costs were twice as high as the producer costs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-06 | Aashish Dhakal | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | folina | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | RTroMT | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-03 | ThoiPhong | 87 | view |
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999 78
- The given picture shows the process of making electricity from coal Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below shows the amount of waste produced by 3 companies over a period of 15 years
- The picture below shows a hot balloon works The picture below shows a hot balloon works Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 56
- The diagrams show a museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, regarding, second, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61009174312 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56818881807 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52752293578 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2887406042 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.666666667 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323604113468 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136352657037 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122947447115 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221718472992 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134950067635 0.0819641961636 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.