The charts shows air pollution levels by different causes among four countries in 2021.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar charts compare how the generating of electricity, transportation and industrial wastes have polluted the air of China, America, Japan and Australia in the year of 2021. As can be seen from the chart, the overall level of air pollution in China is the highest amongst the four countries while that in Australia is the lowest of all.
The level of air pollution caused by different reasons shows similar tendency in China and Japan, with industry created the highest amount of air pollution while electricity generation causes the lowest one. In particular, the pollution levels in China caused by electricity generation, transport and industry are 59PPM, 70PPM and 80PPM respectively. Similarly, those figures of Japan are 16PPM, 30PPM and over 40PPM respectively.
Finally, transport is the major contribution to the air pollution situation in America with nearly 60PPM, which is almost twice as much as electricity generation and industry. Australia's air pollution levels caused by different categories are almost equal with nearly 20PPM for each.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-12 | smiley | 61 | view |
| 2022-02-07 | mrinal | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-07 | mrinal | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-30 | sonicmaster | view | |
| 2021-09-26 | sonicmaster | 67 | view |
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or expe 56
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, similarly, so, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40361445783 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89581139188 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55421686747 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7911555039 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.142857143 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247924699226 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122202383902 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728232066897 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173158916292 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264009850954 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.