China food consumption
The line graph compares three food consumption in china between 1985 and 2010.
It is clear that each 3 food consumption changed several time over the period shown. Overall, the percentage of fish consumption fluctuate a lot in a time which is given and it experienced fastest growth in comparisons with other two food consumption.
In 1985, proportion of fish consumption was 600 in China and the figures for both salt and meat consumption were lower at about 500 and 100 respectively. In 2000, rate of fish consumption had been rising to around 700 while the figure for salt consumption had been decreasing even about 300 and meat consumption illustrated little growth.
By 2010, the percentage of fish consumption was highest and it reached almost 900 compared to meat and salt both was 200.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-07 | Enkhamgalan | 56 | view |
- Compare the advantages and disadvantages of three of the following as media for communicating information. State which you consider to be the most effective.Comics, books, radio, television, film, theaterGive reasons for your answer and include any releva 84
- Immigration has a major impact on the society.What are the main reasons of immigration?To what consequences can it lead? 84
- Immigration has the major impact on the societyWhat are the main reasons of immigration?To what consequences it can lead? 100
- Some countries encourage teenager to have part-time job and see it as a good thing, while others disagree. Give your opinion and explain both views 73
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...ures for both salt and meat consumption were lower at about 500 and 100 respectively...
^^^^
Line 8, column 83, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'compared' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'compares'.
Suggestion: compares
...n was highest and it reached almost 900 compared to meat and salt both was 200.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 674.0 965.302439024 70% => OK
No of words: 134.0 196.424390244 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02985074627 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.40232815919 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85328479614 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611940298507 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 182.7 283.868780488 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.074929819 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.333333333 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422156657338 0.215688989381 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.221251577006 0.103423049105 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104900744922 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255169662758 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121545816869 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.