A glance at the provided line graph illustrates the amount of 6 various energy used and will be used (in quadrillion units) in the USA since 1980 until the predictions in 2030 based on Annual Energy Outlook 2008. In general, it is clearly apparent that all the kinds of energy consumed showed and predicted to have an upward trend except Hydropower which remained and estimated unchanged. Besides, Petrol and oil reported as the highest consumption energy during the period given.
Looking for more detail, the power consumption from petrol and oil in 1980 surpassed the other kinds of energy at 35 quadrillion units. Although it experienced rise and fall until 1995, the number started and predicted to reach about 50 quadrillion units. Natural gas power which ranked the second highest used in the beginning of the periods also reported to have oscilation before showed a plateau in 2015 until the projection year. On the other hand, Solar/wind power which used 5 quadrillion units below the Natural gas in 1980 reported a positive pattern and projected as the second highest energy consumed in 2030 at 30 quadrillion units.
Finally, although the utilization of the trhree remaining energy were recorded at around 4 quadrillion units in 1980, the usage of Nuclear and Coal power will be predicted to climb slightly at 8 and 6 quadrillion units respectively. However, Hydropower energy consumption which showed small fluctuation in 1990-2005 will be estimated steady at the same amount in 2030.
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar graph below shows the amount of carbon emissions in different countries during three different years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The pie charts below compare the proportion of energy capacity in gigawatts GW in 2015 with the predictions for 2040 73
- The bar chart below shows the estimated percentage of car trips taken by drivers in 2005 89
- Many people aim to achieve a balance between their work and lives but few people achieve it What are the causes of this How to overcome this problem 61
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, however, look, second, so, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11836734694 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74110123582 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518367346939 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.9 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.8589008743 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.333333333 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2222222222 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212467782735 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097000161251 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486809988189 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15190961734 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385933496517 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, however, look, second, so, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11836734694 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74110123582 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518367346939 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.9 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.8589008743 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.333333333 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2222222222 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212467782735 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097000161251 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486809988189 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15190961734 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385933496517 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.