The components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000.
The bar graph illustrates the contribution of IT and Service industry to the Gross Domestic Product of the UK between the years 1992 and 2000 measured as a percentage of the overall GDP.
Overall, the contribution made by IT industry had always been higher than its counterpart Service industry. Furthermore, IT industry followed a dramatic upward trend over the years and ended up being almost double the contribution made by Service industry. However, in Service there was a rather gradual upward trend.
In 1992, IT industry’s contribution to the UK’s GDP was just above 6%. It rose a little about 2% in the subsequent two years only to drop just below 8% in 1996. But in the next two years it accelerated rather quickly and increased by almost two-third. This increasing trend continued till 2000 where the overall contribution by IT industry was almost three folds to its initial value.
Regarding the Service industry, it’s initial contribution to the British GDP was exactly 4%. There was an increase of about 50% in contribution from 1992 to 1994, after which there was a steady growth in the Service industry about 0.5 % every year. It accounted nearly 8% to the overall GDP of Britain in 2000.
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The table below shows top ten countries with largest population in 2019 and how it is projected to change by 2100 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 64
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- 8 The following appeared in a memorandum from the planning department of an electric power company Several recent surveys indicate that home owners are increasingly eager to conserve energy At the same time manufacturers are now marketing many home applia 49
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, regarding, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95098039216 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78183963715 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539215686275 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3286638681 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8181818182 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5454545455 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187806801911 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870383694075 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103101386053 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141830597232 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0932183961631 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.