Consumption of Fast Food in the UK
The line graph illustrates the amount of three different types of fast food consumed by people in the UK over a course of 20 years starting in 1970
Overall, it is clear that the figure for Fish & chip witnessed the most dramatic change during the period shown. Additionally, the amount of hamburger and Fish & chips eaten per week had an increasing trend. By contrast, the consumption of Pizza in the UK decreased gradually.
In 1970, the quantity of pizza consumed was the highest, at more than 300 grams. While the figure for fish & cheap stood at around 100 grams, three times lower than the amount of pizza consumption. Approximate 20 grams Hamburger was weekly eaten by the UK people
By 1990, the amount of hamburger eaten rose dramatically, registering the highest position at 500 grams. There was a similar increasing trend in fish & chips’ figure at around 300 grams. Meanwhile, the consumption of pizza decreased by 100 grams
- The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufacturers to produce vehicles at their US factories 81
- The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufacturers to produce vehicles at their US factories 84
- the chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008. summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- In some countries, some high school leavers are choosing to work or travel for a period before going to university. Discuss advantages and disadvantages of those school leavers’ decision. Give your opinion. 73
- Early technological developments brought more benefits and changes to people’s life than the recent technological developments. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...burger was weekly eaten by the UK people By 1990, the amount of hamburger eaten r...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 788.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98734177215 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75353619755 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563291139241 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 64.02343321 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161219855214 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758147494179 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0929962524659 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105456855115 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0785987377257 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.