The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
The given line chart details the information about water use universally, while the table depicts the amount of water that is used in two distinctive regions including Brazil and Democratic Republic of Congo.
Overview, it is obvious that a huge amount of water is utilized in three sectors increased to varying degrees and agriculture fields used large amount of water. Meanwhile the greater population and vast land of Brazil is attached with higher water consumption than Democratic Republic of Congo.
Looking more closely at the pie chart, the amount of water used for agricultural purpose started at about 500 km3 in the first year, after which saw a rise to just over 1000 km3 after 50 years, the figure increased consistently and finally reach a peak at roughly 3000 km3 in 2000. Turning to the remaining sectors, Water used in the industrial and domestic sectors also increased, but started the lower period with insignificant figure and rose minimally until 1950. From 1950 onward, the water used for both aforementioned sectors grew steadily with 1000 km3 for industrial sector and about 300 m3, which were lower than the counterparts.
According to the table, the water consumption of Brazil was significant with the figure being at 359 m3 for watering plants due to the immense territory (26,500 km2) and large population (176 million). By contrast, with the smaller land (100 km2) and only 5,2 million people living in Democratic Republic of Congo, the used water for irrigating was not considerable with only 8 m3.
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 73
- The given charts give information about the number of students at university in the Uk from 1991 to 2002 government spending and the types of family economic background they cam from in 1991 73
- The bar chart provides information about how often people in the USA spent ate fast food from 2003 to 2013 The bar chart provides information about how often people in the USA spent ate fast food from 2003 to 2013 The bar chart provides information about 73
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 84
- The world has many towns and cities constructed in previous centuries that were more suitable and livable for people in those times than they are now What problems will this cause What can be done to solve these problems 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 252.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09126984127 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69234553685 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56746031746 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.7965608232 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.375 112.824112599 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271847794167 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136440968545 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755398597435 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196083292435 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0775755158539 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.