The consumption of fast food in the UK from 1970 to 1990.
The graph represent the amount of fast food consumed in the uk between 1970 and 1990.
The three lines describe different dish: hamburger in blue, fish & chips in red and pizza in green. In this period, the consumption of pizza decreased from 300g to 200g, on the contrary the others increased, with a maximum reached by fish & chips between 1980 and 1990 with a final consumption of 500g. it can be connected to the fact that a lot of tourist came to the uk to eat some traditional dishes and prefer them to food which is not typical of England. In the case of hamburger there was an increase between 1985 and 1990, but it was less than that of fish & chips.
In conclusion, in a period of 30 years there was a huge increase in the amount of fast food consumed. In 1970, British ate about 450g a week of fast food, on the other hand, in 1990 there was a consumption which was doubled to 1000g.
- The bar chart below shows the results of survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on 2 groups of worker :those aged from 18_30 and those aged 45_60 ,and shows factors affecting their work performance 78
- The graph shows Underground Station Passenger Numbers in London. 78
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons 56
- The table below shows the changes in some household types in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant 82
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'represents'.
Suggestion: represents
The graph represent the amount of fast food consumed in the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... 1990 with a final consumption of 500g. it can be connected to the fact that a lot...
^^
Line 3, column 574, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it was less than that of fish & chips. In conclusion, in a period of 30 years t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...se in the amount of fast food consumed. In 1970, British ate about 450g a week of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, in conclusion, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 730.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.34523809524 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3762415106 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 201.6 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6633855654 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.285714286 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395546430067 0.215688989381 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169184630828 0.103423049105 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138149495476 0.0843802449381 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302012711316 0.15604864568 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103247408946 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.96 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.25 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.