The line charts compares fish and some different kinds of meat, namely chicken, beef, lamb, in terms of their individual demand per week in a European country from 1979 to 2004.
It is clear that fish was the least commonly used food in the European country throughout the period shown. Also, the expenditure on beef, lamb and fish decrease, while there was a fluctuating increase in the figure for chicken.
It can be seen from the graph that in 1979, beef’s intake was the highest, at about 220 grams per person per week. This was followed by the consumption of lamb and chicken which had figures of approximately 150 grams and 145 grams respectively. Meanwhile, each person ate only 60 grams fish per week.
During the following years, the European country saw a significant growth to around 250 grams in the consumption of chicken. By contrast, the demand of beef and lamb halved to 100 grams and 75 grams per week respectively . By contrast, there was a slight fell in the consumption of fish, with the figure decreasing by about 10 grams in 2004.
- School should not force children to learn a foreign language. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- In many cities planners tend to arrange shops schools offices and homes in specific areas and separate them from each other Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 77
- The government should invest more money in teaching science than in other subjects for a country s development and progress To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Living in big cities is bad for people s health To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 85
- The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 221, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...grams and 75 grams per week respectively . By contrast, there was a slight fell in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80434782609 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62693804765 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570652173913 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0842438561 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2222222222 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196321006993 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818270358707 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845522764088 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132504433719 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.096195253111 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.