5.Many people go to university for academic study. More people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians or plumbers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Recently, there has been a large debate about the orientation upon graduating from high school. While I agree that more people should be encouraged to attend vocational training courses due to low tuition and saving time, I also believe that many people should go to university for academic study in some special job and prior position in companies.
On the one hand, more workers trained in skilled professions such as plumbers and electrical work brings many benefits. First, it helps people lessen the burden of family finance. That learning at university takes at least 4 years to be completed in comparison with 2-year vocational training is obvious. The less time people spend on studying, the less money they have to pay for education. Secondly, it is no need for manual workers to waste their time on studying some career-unrelated subjects which are taught in the university. For example, an electrician would find it fruitless to learn political subjects.
On the other hand, pursuing academic studies at university still eventually surpass a vocational training in achievement. First of all, some specials jobs such as doctors or teachers required many qualifications that have to be trained for a long-term in a bid to fulfill their dreams. For example, If a doctor were not taught about human anatomy at the university by successful professors, they would lack knowledge and cause detrimental health effects to the patients. Second, many firms today prefer a university graduate employee than a physical labor. This is result in the unemployments of a large number of people who attended vocational training.
All in all, although doing vocational training has some acknowledge benefits, I believe that people should go to university for academic study in some special career and better job opportunities

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 596, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... This is result in the unemployments of a large number of people who attended vocational training...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, at least, for example, such as, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90689280886 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599315068493 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6714996642 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359069558774 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106510288503 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829320697496 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228239054667 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373527085471 0.056905535591 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.