CONSUMPTION OF SPREADS
The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007.
The line graph compares the amount of three different spreads, namely, margarine, low fat and reduced spreads as well as butter, in grams, which were consumed over 26 years from 1981 to 2007.
Overall, at the beginning of the time period there were two dominant spreads, butter and margarine. Their consumption rates decreased over the given time frame with some fluctuations, while the red line, that indicates the latter created spread which is low fat and reduced spreads indicates an increase in the final years.
With regards to amount of butter used, it began around 140 grams and reached its peak at around 160 grams in 1986, then followed dramatic decrease until 2007. Likewise, just over 90 grams margarine was eaten in the 1981, then blue line demonstrates a slight decrease during next 5 years and before diminishing to 40 grams at the end of period, it showed an increment by reaching its plateau phase in 1991.
On the other hand, the amount of low fat and reduced spreads peaked at nearly 80 grams in 2001 from its beginning value approximately about 10 grams in 1996. At the last year, the red line shows around 70 grams low fat and reduced spreads was used, which is the most consumed spread among the kinds of spreads.
- Something in your area is causing concern and write to your MSP with details of your concerns and your proposed solution. 70
- Hours of leisure time per year in Someland 85
- WATER CONSUMPTIONThe graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 78
- Write an email or a letter a new penfriend in another country 66
- Many young people leaving school think that going to university will give them higher wages, superior career prospects and greater job satisfaction. However, they would be better to get a job and start earning as soon as possible.Do your agree or disagree 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise, so, then, well, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1026.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77209302326 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35647388539 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586046511628 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5425345032 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.571428571 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7142857143 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 5.23603664747 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181205612161 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888477082237 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0978093917889 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118777952728 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862922344391 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.