Transportation mode in European city 1960-2000
The diagram illustrates the diverse kinds of transportation that was utilized by the people who live in one of European city in three different years, 1960, 1980, 2000 respectively.
Overall, the necessity of using car as transportation increased from 1960 to 2000, whereas number of travelers who use other types of travelling ways, decreased through the given period.
In detail, the car usage was 5 % among travelers at the beginning of period, then it showed a dramatic growth and jumped to 35 % in 2000. Although nearly 35% of citizens prefer to walk in order to reach work or their home in 1960, only 6% percentage of people used bike at the end given period.
Before the bus usage felt around 15% in terms of transportation in 2000, it reached a peak in 1980 approximately, 26% popularity. On the other hand, the preference of bike use showed a significant drop between 1960 and 2000 from 25% to 20%, then 6%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-19 | Chen ni | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-10 | mary.ssherr | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | nkajune | view | |
| 2023-03-02 | nkajune | view |
- Something in your area is causing concern and write to your MSP with details of your concerns and your proposed solution. 70
- Life cycle and anatomy of a lady bird 72
- The table below the housing, house prices and income trends in the city of Newby from 1995-2005. There are concerns about the shortage of affordable housing in the areas as a result of increased house prices and a lack of cheaper accommodation available t 80
- UK Telephone Call, by category, 1995-2002 84
- Adults and children spending on 4 common items in UK in 1998 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 761.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78616352201 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85596789235 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654088050314 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.342103745 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 126.833333333 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283231087663 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135007351458 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907507475843 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178136007648 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915198103665 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.