the data illustrate the ratio of different kinds of energy production of france in two years.
overall,the data shows it was consisted of four exact categories.it was petro,gas,nuclear,coal and others.it can be seen that the biggest value was coal in both years.
it can tell from the data,the highest increase was not explain from all characteristic but it was others energy in france have been increased 4,2%,from 4,90% in 1995 to 9,10% in 2005.and the second greatest percentage it was nuclear has been increased around 3-4% from 6% to 10%.overtaken by coal,it was third raise around 1% from 29% to 30% but it was the most up from all categories in 1995 or 2005.while the smallest one was gas,it just grow up less from 1% from 29,63% to 30,31%.
on other hand,the last categories petro was the only energy which experienced decrease.petro had decreased really significant.it was around 9% and almost reach 10% from 29% to 19%.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-04 | Humayan Kabir | 56 | view |
2019-12-12 | Zulph_ | 73 | view |
2019-12-12 | Jesslynindah | 56 | view |
2019-12-12 | Jesslynindah | 56 | view |
2019-12-12 | Zulph_ | 56 | view |
- The data which showed by graph explain the growth of population fron 1940 to 2000 in three districts which located in the U.S. state of oregon. 56
- the data shows the average household in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 73
- the pie chart explain the online shopping sales for retail sectors in canadian country from 2005 to 2010. 56
- The graph shows information about the expenditure of energy in USA from 1980 and projection to 2030. 78
- the data illustrate the ratio of different kinds of energy production of france in two years. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
overall,the data shows it was consisted of four...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
overall,the data shows it was consisted of four exa...
^^^^
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , gas
...ed of four exact categories.it was petro,gas,nuclear,coal and others.it can be seen ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , coal
...xact categories.it was petro,gas,nuclear,coal and others.it can be seen that the bigg...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...gest value was coal in both years. it can tell from the data,the highest incr...
^^
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...th years. it can tell from the data,the highest increase was not explain from a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'explained'.
Suggestion: explained
...m the data,the highest increase was not explain from all characteristic but it was othe...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...nd 3-4% from 6% to 10%.overtaken by coal,it was third raise around 1% from 29% to 3...
^^^
Line 5, column 432, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...5 or 2005.while the smallest one was gas,it just grow up less from 1% from 29,63% t...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...ess from 1% from 29,63% to 30,31%. on other hand,the last categories petro wa...
^^
Line 9, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...rom 29,63% to 30,31%. on other hand,the last categories petro was the only ener...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, really, second, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 704.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 141.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99290780142 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.44591672665 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16429708108 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.659574468085 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 188.1 283.868780488 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 8.94146341463 34% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 47.0 22.4926829268 209% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 145.996194775 43.030603864 339% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 234.666666667 112.824112599 208% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 47.0 22.9334400587 205% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 12.3333333333 5.23603664747 236% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0548557394302 0.215688989381 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425874342274 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0119222114038 0.0843802449381 14% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0425874342274 0.15604864568 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0119222114038 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.6 13.2329268293 193% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.3012195122 176% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.55 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 11.4329268293 245% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 20.8 10.9970731707 189% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.