Details of politicians’ private lives should not be published in newspapers. To what extent do you agree "or" disagree?
It is said that details of politicians' private lives shouldn't be revealed in public media. I strongly support this statement, because spreading propaganda affects not only their personal lives and families, but also breaking the laws.
One of the reasons I agree with that idea is because revealing details about politician private lives (whether it's good or not) are harmful for their and their families lives. Indecisive people when knowing these information will strictly criticize the story and spreading unwanted rumors, causing stressful and dissonant. In many suicide cases of politicians, critical comments are killers. In 2009, a sorrowful suicide of former president Roh-moo Hyun of Korea shocked the whole country. He was helpless and depressed when hearing sarcastic comments and finally made a decision to end his life.
Another reason against publishing details of politicians’ private lives is because it's violate the federal law. Paparazzi and journalist knows that these jobs hurt famous people' feelings and also violate the law of privacy. In most countries, paparazzi can be sued for money or accused if they are founded committing crimes. After 1990, lots of accusations against paparazzi were made and the world saw a significantly positive change towards this problem.
In a nutshell, details of politicians' private life shouldn't be published in newspaper anyhow. Publishing these information will just boost propaganda, damage politicians' mental health and commit a crime.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-18 | AnnaAlysia | 84 | view |
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 73
- In some countries many people suffer from health problems due to eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food Do you agree or disagree 73
- In some countries many people suffer from health problems due to eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food Do you agree or disagree 84
- People sleep less than they used in the past What do you think is the reason behind this What are the effects on them 56
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...at details of politicians private lives shouldnt be revealed in public media. I strongly...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...s lives. Indecisive people when knowing these information will strictly criticize the story and s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 52, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ll, details of politicians private life shouldnt be published in newspaper anyhow. Publi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...blished in newspaper anyhow. Publishing these information will just boost propaganda, damage poli...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 5.60731707317 339% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1276.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57205240175 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76374024466 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 106.607317073 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659388646288 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 283.868780488 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8209050322 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1538461538 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6153846154 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 1.13902439024 790% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243828865371 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896446212252 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116753114067 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161275126281 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699400571696 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 40.7170731707 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.