The diagram below give information about two road tunnels in one Australian city

The diagram gives information about some statistics for making two roads crossing tunnels A and B in one city in Australia.
Over the period from 1987 to 1992, the cost to make a road was through tunnel A was remarkably half of that paid for the road through tunnel B made from 2004 to 2007.
First of all, road tunnel A was made before the appearance of road tunnel B for approximately 10 years or more and took 5 years to accomplish while it was 3 years for road tunnel B. In terms of usage, people are able to travel under road tunnel A by waterway, however, the road tunnel B was made for reducing the volume and the speed of traffic. A notable fact is that road tunnel A costed dirt cheap, at $556 million which is significantly cheaper than $1.1 billion of road tunnel B; however, in road tunnel B, it was expanded both height and depth perspectives with 35 meters and 3.6 kilometers.
In conclusion, both road tunnels had 2 tubes that connect at both ends and permit different genres of transport such as a car, bus, truck, and so on.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, while, in conclusion, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.39267015707 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51018593229 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596858638743 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.9729250748 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.833333333 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8333333333 22.9334400587 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1666666667 5.23603664747 213% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347916755528 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.201872345875 0.103423049105 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157982227708 0.0843802449381 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238372690674 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.186307210443 0.0819641961636 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.85 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.