The diagram below illustrates how a simple water filter is constructed and how it functions to produce clean drinking water. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the diagram below.
The diagram depicts that the progress is manufactured the clean drinking water by using the water filter.
Overall, it can be seen that there are plenty of steps which is undertaken to the final water that could be serving for people.
In the first step, pouring the impure water into a metal container with covering up with a wooden lid. The metal container, there are divided into three levels of filtering layers. Starting with the first level, water was going into the sand, then it is soaked into the charcoal, and ending with the gravel at the bottom.
At the following stages, a flanked metal pipe is there which is linked to the holed tank where it is placed below the drinking water storage tank. The water on the upper container passed a pipe to transferring into the storage tank where is at the lower level than the first tank. Eventually, a tap is attached to the tank which is provided clean water for people.
- Many people who leave school hold a negative attitude towards learning Why does this happen Solutions 78
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football While other people think that taking part in individual sports is better like tennis or swimming Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produced 78
- The diagram below shows one way of manufacturing ceramic pots 36
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements and this is a bad example to adolescents To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 764.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6303030303 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25381219748 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527272727273 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.4562747572 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.5 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199903568297 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102363211069 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906835993802 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146508786505 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106149885421 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.