The diagram below show the process of taking driving licence Write a report for a University lecturer describing the information below

Essay topics:

The diagram below show the process of taking driving licence. Write a report for a University lecturer describing the information below.

The given pictorial representation illustrates the information regarding the higher institution professor tells about the process of getting driving licence.

It can be apparently over viewed that, it all the steps involved in taking driving licence process is inextricable. Omission of any step may halt the whole process.

As can be witnessed from the given information, on the initial basis individuals have to visit a licence Centre followed by this complete application form to complete centre queries. Moving further, afterthat eye testing is done by the department, if eyesight is weak then they fail in this test and applicant is not able to take licence while they are considered as not applicant, whilst, if I test is pass then they will pay fee for further process.

Further demonstrating the key features, despite from pay fee, written test and driving test taken by the centre if test fails then written test is taken again and again, after failed to times they have to pay fee again to be in test. In the next step, if driving test fails, again will pay free or on the other hand bypass driving test, eventually, applicant will get their driving licence.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-30 Zahid6400 78 view
2024-06-30 Zahid6400 67 view
2023-08-17 eyyejesse view
2023-05-09 vuhungbo 84 view
2023-04-10 bnhanh02 10 view
Essays by user dilpreet7528 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...ey will pay fee for further process. Further demonstrating the key features, despite...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 187, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'time'.
Suggestion: time
... taken again and again, after failed to times they have to pay fee again to be in tes...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, if, may, regarding, so, then, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01020408163 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70250242681 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591836734694 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.4576208611 43.030603864 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.285714286 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121077227469 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704875155586 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434676552031 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0910983825257 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357698319501 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.