The line chart illustrates changes in meat consumption patterns in the United States between 1960 and 2003 for three different types of meat: pork, chicken, and beef.
Overall, we can see that while beef was the most popular type of meat during the first three decades, chicken ultimately surpassed both pork and beef as the preferred type of meat. In particular, chicken consumption increased steadily from 1960 to about 1985, at which point it surpassed beef consumption. Pork consumption remained relatively stable throughout the period, with only a slight decline in the 1970s and 1980s.
In more detail, beef consumption started at around 40 pounds per person in 1960, peaked at just under 90 pounds in 1975, and then began a gradual decline to around 60 pounds by 2003. Pork consumption experienced a small decline from around 50 pounds in the early 1960s to around 40 pounds in the mid-1970s, and remained relatively steady thereafter. Chicken consumption was the lowest of the three meats in 1960 at around 25 pounds per person, but grew steadily over the next several decades, surpassing beef consumption in the mid-1980s and reaching almost 85 pounds per person by 2003.
In conclusion, the line chart shows that chicken consumption in the United States has grown rapidly over the past several decades and now exceeds that of both pork and beef. While beef consumption was the most popular during the first three decades, it has since declined and been overtaken by chicken. Pork consumption has remained relatively steady throughout the period.
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops Write a summary paragraph for the above diagram 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007 67
- The diagram below shows information about carbon dioxide emissions fuel consumption and flight costs for popular private jets Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007 67
- The graph below shows the weekday volume of passenger activity on the Toronto Metro system for July 2007 47
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, then, while, in conclusion, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1310.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13725490196 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62187292 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498039215686 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 356.4 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5868099314 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146370174587 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732195367741 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387925159236 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115151962353 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031933302236 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, then, while, in conclusion, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1310.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13725490196 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62187292 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498039215686 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 356.4 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5868099314 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146370174587 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732195367741 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387925159236 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115151962353 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031933302236 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.