Fossil fuels e g coal oil and gas are the main source of energy for most countries However alternative sources of energy e g wind and solar have been encouraged for use by some countries To what extent is this a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

Fossil fuels (e.g. coal, oil and gas) are the main source of energy for most countries. However, alternative sources of energy (e.g. wind and solar) have been encouraged for use by some countries. To what extent is this a positive or negative development?

Nowadays, energy is one of the most crucial and considerable issues in the world and it is evidenced that fossil fuels are used as the main source of energy for most countries. Besides, because of the drawbacks of using fossil fuels, people in some countries encourage others to utilize alternative energy sources. In my opinion, there might be some disadvantages when moving to use natural resources energy, but eventually this development will bring us more benefits.
On the one hand, alternative energy sourcres are friendly to environment in compasion with fossil fuels, since they come from moving water, wind, the sun, and gas from animal waste, and also because electric production or running vehicles release very little, or even no, emissions when used. For example, solar panels put on vast areas or individual buliding absorb heat from the sun to create solar energy, or making use of winds to create electricity from wind turbines. On the other hand, there are only a few limitations on exploiting alternative resources energy because the progress of creating energy depends wholly on weather conditions. If there isn’t any wind or sunshine in some cases, solar panels or wind turbines won’t work in order to create electricity.
The next thing to mention is that if alternative energy is more popular in use, there will be more development in products and cars manufacturing industry, also in order to respond to global warming and greenhouse effect that become even worse and adversely affect humanbeing and other living creatures day by day. There is empirical data showing that more and more people choose to use electric cars rather than conventional types of cars, not only because of the convenience but also because of the benefits they bring us. In contrast to this, exploiting natural energy resources require high initial cost to develop machines and equipments, and that may put financial burden on the government or companies. Especially for some undeveloped countries, it will be a problem if they consider replacing fossil fuels with alternative energy.
In summary, finding the appropriate energy sources is never easy at first. While there’re still some drawbacks when deciding to use alternative energy, the pros of replacing fossil fuels are still promising. Personally, I believe that the benefits in terms of moving forward using alternative energy eventually outweigh any negatives

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-23 roadtoapro 73 view
2020-10-07 iamktw90 84 view
Essays by user roadtoapro :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 392, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...isadvantages when moving to use natural resources energy, but eventually this development...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 552, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...w limitations on exploiting alternative resources energy because the progress of creating...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'creatures'' or 'creature's'?
Suggestion: creatures'; creature's
...sely affect humanbeing and other living creatures day by day. There is empirical data sho...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 188, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...rgy, the pros of replacing fossil fuels are still promising. Personally, I believe that the benefit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, so, still, while, for example, in contrast, in summary, in contrast to, in my opinion, in some cases, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2041.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27390180879 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7530502053 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537467700258 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.6348341499 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.785714286 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6428571429 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0714285714 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348909032073 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122867703622 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754436100287 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223696173843 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0930740510779 0.056905535591 164% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.