The diagram below shows the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960.
The depicted pictorial enumerates the difference that has carried out at Queen Mary Hospital since its opening in 1960.
Overall, the Queen Mary Hospital was completely transformed with the establishment of various development infrastructure. However, the Hospital and the Car park was not altered.
To initiate, over the period, the area witnessed dramatic changes alike, the shopping center was split in 1960 which was replaced by a cancer center and pharmacy in 1980. The farmland in 1960 was demolished and developed a Nursing school in 1980. In addition, the hospital and the car park was not changed for over twenty years.
Furthermore, from 1980 to 2000, the Queen Mary Hospital saw spectacular developments. Cancer center was renovated and had extended the area in 2000 by removing the nursery school. Moreover, a new nursery school was built next to the cancer center by demolishing half part of the car park. Surprisingly, pharmacy and hospital, as well as half part of the car park, was not modernized.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-25 | karan dadral | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | MaganpreetSingh | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | Dang Thi Truc Linh | 22 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | Shivani Jani | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | Hoang Luan | 84 | view |
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. 56
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in the world and in different countries. 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Summarise the changes to Liverpool John Moores University from 2010 to 2016. 61
- The table below shows the primary funding sources of international students in the US during the years 2003 04 and 2013 14 Write a 150 word report for a university lecturer describing the data and make comparisons where relevant 39
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tal and the Car park was not altered. To initiate, over the period, the area w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 864.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23636363636 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89233812593 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557575757576 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1444853995 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176139703427 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841730457762 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924296643928 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147516694689 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103828743506 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.