The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in the world and in different countries.
The depicted bar graph enumerates the comparative data about the proportion of the population living in the city areas in the world and in various respective countries in three particular years 1950, 2007 as well as 2030.
Overall, it is clear that the ratio of the population in the world living in city areas seem to have increased gradually for over three periods. However, North America had experienced an upward trend throughout the years as compared to others.
To initiate, in terms of North America the population in downtown places seems to rise, from 64 percent in 1950 to 79 percent in 2007 and expected to reach 87 percent in 2030. However, the majority of Europe and Latin American Caribbean had peaked from 1950 to 2007 and predicted to incline up in 2030, simultaneously.
On the contrary, in the context of Africa and Asia, there seem to have a tiny fraction difference in all respective time frames. Furthermore, the world population in city areas had hiked 29 percent to 1950 and reached 49 percent in the following year 2007. Likewise, it is estimated to heightened about 60 percent in the consecutive year 2030.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-29 | Milan karki | 73 | view |
- Some people think government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- The diagram below shows the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960 76
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002. 61
- Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- Summarise the changes to Liverpool John Moores University from 2010 to 2016. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, likewise, well, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94300518135 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76041831238 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538860103627 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9982421489 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.25 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 5.23603664747 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15895464936 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072340734787 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705184526224 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112768685558 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653682932412 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.