The diagram below shows the development of Assford between 1965 and the present day.
The provided two pictures illustrate some main changes taking place in an area of Assford from 1965 to now.
Overall, it is evident that Assford has become a much more vibrant and modern region with the introduction of various facilities. Another interesting point is the improvement of the transport infrastructure.
Looking at the information in more detail, one of the most striking changes has been the erection of a road bridge which replaces the original ferry. On the northern side of the road bridge, there used to be a green area with trees scattered around; however, trees have been chopped down to make way for a considerably large car park. Another smaller one, meanwhile, has been built on the opposite side of the river, surrounded by blocks of apartments and houses.
To the southern side of the road bridge, there is also a residential area located alongside the arterial road. Furthermore, it is planned that by 2025 there will have been some other changes. The development involves the erection of a foot bridge that runs parallel with the road one and some car parks.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-08-25 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
2024-03-25 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
2023-12-01 | Delime | 78 | view |
2023-10-12 | Molla Md Rezaul Karim | 73 | view |
2023-09-18 | maiphuonganh | 84 | view |
- The maps below show recent changes in the town of Kimsville Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Every country has poor people and every country has different ways of dealing with the poor and poverty What are some of the reasons for world poverty What can be done to assist the poor 84
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since there is computer technology To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015
- The maps below show recent changes in the town of Kimsville Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92391304348 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72051993807 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597826086957 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4081062117 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.666666667 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.061544183421 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0238719367609 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0303993453911 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0408130139605 0.15604864568 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342451896046 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.