Plan A shows a health centre in 2005. Plan B shows the same place in the present day. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The two diagrams demonstrate the changes that have taken place in a health centre between 2005 and now.
Generally, from 2005 to the present, there have been vast changes in the size and structure of the building, such as more facilities (a minor operations room, a children’s play area) and expansions of some regions.
In 2005, it can be seen that there was a main entrance in front of the health centre, located next to a 12-space car park. Coming into the centre, many seats were put there for clients waiting for consultation. Going along to the end of the hallway, there would be a reception desk for service registering purposes. In addition, an office and consultation room 3 were located on the left side of the building, and on the opposite side, it was also two more consultation rooms. Passing through the receptionist, a Physiotherapy room was built behind.
In the present day, the layout of the centre has been restructured, including diminishing in size of the garden to expand the parking region to 30 slots. The main entrance is now situated at the bottom left corner of the centre with the reception table and a new children’s playground. Furthermore, there is a wider space with several seats in the middle of the building for waiting purposes. Last but not least, all the other rooms, including old rooms and a new minor operations room, have been rebuilt and relocated around the waiting area.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-03-25 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
2023-12-01 | Delime | 78 | view |
2023-06-28 | Tuệ Nguyễn | 58 | view |
2022-06-11 | kevann | 89 | view |
2022-05-22 | kamelelahe | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The chart and graph below give information about three categories of workers in Australia and unemployment levels in three countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The table below gives information about the temperatures and hours of daylight during the same weekend in two cities in May 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the protein and calorie intakes of people in different parts of the world Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Going along to the end of the hallway, there would be a reception desk for serv...
^^
Line 4, column 79, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: diminishing
...centre has been restructured, including diminishing in size of the garden to expand the parking reg...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, so, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1177.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8237704918 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76331340377 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561475409836 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.191124407 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1818181818 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0923820254782 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363529064264 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449478517946 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0682612354693 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390312689688 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.