The maps detail the divergences of a specific town from 1965 to the present day. Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the density of accommodation has grown, which stems from the increasing rate of residents.
In 1995, there were a few Assford houses to the northeast of the town and the forest at the opposite bank. None of the bridges were constructed at that time; therefore, roads on both banks were separated. Nevertheless, the ferry was the only option to cross the river.
Back to the present, the former forest is replaced by the car park, Two new of which were added to the south and near Assford houses. To the south of town, new buildings for living purposes are erected, and numerous small figures run along the right banks. In addition, pupils vary their choices to cross the bridge due to the ferry in 1995 was transformed into two kinds of bridge: road bridge and footbridge. The former was built for vehicles, while the latter was only used by people going on foot.
- This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5 000 couples
- The diagram below shows the development of a particular area between 1965 and the present day 11
- Some believe technology has made our lives too complex and the solution is to lead a simpler life without technology To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The diagram below shows the development of a particular area between 1965 and the present day 11
- This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5 000 couples
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68539325843 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47660432726 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61797752809 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.2434565926 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6666666667 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0504613003947 0.215688989381 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0257182246853 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594394149273 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0380243112003 0.15604864568 24% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415125224169 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.