According to the uptick in technologies nowadays, it plays an essential role, which supporting people in all parts of our daily lives. However, a group of people approves that complex life stems from gadgets, so the restriction is an effective solution. From my perspective, a complex life or not hinge on the using way, which is made sense by this essay.
Initially, due to the improvement of technology in the modern day, Scientists endeavor to research and invent more and more smart types of equipment serving our lives comprising humanoid and artificial intelligence. In the past, if people wanted to keep in touch with others, they would write letters and waste much of their time sending them. About 2 or 3 months to get the message are fundamental at that time. In lieu of that, the development of the world changes the way we contacting with people, even those who are far from us. People just type the available alphabet on the screen and enter it, for about a couple of seconds, each other can receive and reply.
Moreover, The effort to improve technology started with the purpose of developing the quality of life. In lieu of grasping the opportunity of an era via technology to contribute knowledge and eye-opening with the variety of online information. Nevertheless, many residents do not know how to use it sufficiently leading to bad consequences. For instance, Teenagers, who experience the curious age, have a great many questions, especially about the Internet. If parents do not care and guide them, adolescents can approach it in a negative way. Some strangers with evil purposes strike up conversations with children and youth do not know. They can be gotten into bad company and become addicted. The addiction discourages them from real interaction and causes social isolation.
In conclusion, I believe technology does not make our lives complex. It was invented to make our life more convenient and people do not know how to use is not only think it complex, but also causes consequences. If people use it adequately, it will become the most efficient item making our lives better day by day.
- The diagram below shows the development of a particular area between 1965 and the present day 11
- Some people think that the government should invest in teaching science rather than in other subjects for a country development and progress What extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 11
- The diagram below shows the development of a particular area between 1965 and the present day 11
- This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5 000 couples
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 429, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndamental at that time. In lieu of that, the development of the world changes the...
^^
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...guide them, adolescents can approach it in a negative way. Some strangers with evil purposes stri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95238095238 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86349050467 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616246498599 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8460802312 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0526315789 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7894736842 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57894736842 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205058024251 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609812641453 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706972288357 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12504767685 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055718913375 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 429, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndamental at that time. In lieu of that, the development of the world changes the...
^^
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...guide them, adolescents can approach it in a negative way. Some strangers with evil purposes stri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95238095238 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86349050467 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616246498599 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8460802312 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0526315789 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7894736842 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57894736842 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205058024251 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609812641453 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706972288357 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12504767685 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055718913375 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.