The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram illustrates how a hydroelectric power station generates electricity.
Overall, it is clear that the process involves different stages, beginning with water flowing into a reservoir and ending with electricity transmitting to a national grid.
The procedure commences with river water being held in a high-level reservoir, which is constructed by building a dam to stop river flow and lowering the river bed.
Following that, an intake that is open during the daytime and closed at night allows water to flow to reversible turbines to generate electricity. These turbines turn on a generator in a power station, which produces power lines that are then transmitted to the national grid. Next, during the day, water is released into a low-level reservoir for storage, but at night, it is pushed back into the reversible turbines, which provide a push to pump water back into the high-level reservoir, ready for daytime operations.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-03-31 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
2024-02-21 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 61 | view |
2023-06-12 | Aung | 78 | view |
2022-10-07 | Hồ Phi Long | 73 | view |
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 78
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did a regular physical activity in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 802.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34666666667 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93527208657 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593333333333 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7977686193 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.666666667 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.16666666667 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105786353257 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879230284415 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120638370127 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106374956373 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135425723142 0.0819641961636 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 802.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34666666667 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93527208657 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593333333333 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7977686193 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.666666667 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.16666666667 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105786353257 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879230284415 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120638370127 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106374956373 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135425723142 0.0819641961636 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.