The diagram illustrates how plastic bottles are recycled through different processes.
In general, plastic bottles are thrown away by people in dustbins and after that procedure, these bottles are picked up by eco-friendly trucks. Then, there are also several types of methods to achieve reliable products which are made from plastic bottles.
Firstly, people fill the trash box with bottles and the dustbin that is full of plastic bottles is emptied by garbage trucks. Afterward, all gathered plastic bottles are brought to the recycling center to be sorted thoroughly by employees. If there are some ill-suited bottles to recycle, they will be removed. Thereon, plastic bottles are compressed in blocks that are shaped like quadrangle prisms.
Next, blocks are crushed by two big iron wheels, and tiny crushed pieces of bottles are washed to prepare for squeezing. After, plastic pallets are squashed like flour. Then, they are heated to form raw material. Finally, recycled plastic bottles are available to produce products such as plastic containers, pencils, and clothes.
- write a report describing the info below The flowchart below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans 61
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 73
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The line graph below shows the production of paper wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...es are washed to prepare for squeezing. After, plastic pallets are squashed like flou...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, so, then, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46428571429 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51196118194 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0901116325 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4545454545 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2727272727 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209672580094 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840812064162 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522291489097 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142687161812 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356731969861 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.