The chart details data about alterations in accommodation prices in five cities between 1990 and 2002 and these are compared with the typical prices of houses in 1989.
Overall, a notable change occurred in Tokyo in 1996-2002 and the values increased dramatically by 12 percent and the least shifts had shown in Frankfurt dwellings by 2% growth between 1996 and 2002.
The biggest shift was shown in London and Tokyo with a decline of -7 percent. By contrast, cottages in Madrid and Frankfurt had a rise in costs by 2 and 2,5 %. In addition, New York city's residence prices had a fall of rates of -5% and -2 % lesser than Madrid and Tokyo in 1990-1995 years.
When it comes 1996-2002, the expenditure for purchasing households in New York City and Madrid escalated by 10 percent in New York and 2 percent in Madrid and it was more than the standard prices in 1990-1995. Then, the expenses of accommodations in Frankfurt were lowered by 1 percent differed from 1990-1995 years. However, there was a little decrease in payments for buying houses in Tokyo by -5 percent from 1996-2002 years. Finally, the value of houses in London rose significantly by 12 percent from 1996-2002 years. If we compare it with 1990-2002 years, there was a 19 percent growth.
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 73
- write a report describing the info below The flowchart below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans 61
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 73
- write a report describing the info below The flowchart below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans 61
- The line graph below shows the production of paper wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, then, well, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71807474307 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532407407407 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0749414976 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.4 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213887278705 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100333760795 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109308964243 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171816208236 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141980988282 0.0819641961636 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.