The diagram below shows a process for turning dirty water into clean water Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The diagram below shows a process for turning dirty water into clean water.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The figure illustrates the stages of cleaning dirty water that in the end the water be clean .

We can see that full process do not require much time and we need 2 mugs, dirty water, plastic bottle and also some materials.

The adaption of dirty water begins with dividing of plastic bottle into 2 parts. Then the cotton wool filter is put to the bottom. Above the wool filter the fine sand is spread and small rocks are placed on it. After this filter paper packed and the final stage of making water filter the bottle is put into clean mug that we can use water from that.

For beginning of process require dirty and muddy water. The water is poured into the plastic and top paper clean the water from rubbish. Gravel, small rocks and fine sand tide up it from bacteria and cotton wool clean the water from other ingradients.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-01-02 nguyendangquang.aspect 78 view
2023-01-02 nguyendangquang.aspect 78 view
2021-04-03 farhodyusupov 61 view
Essays by user farhodyusupov :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...water that in the end the water be clean We can see that full process do not requ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 674.0 965.302439024 70% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43421052632 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.82491983659 2.65546596893 69% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513157894737 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 206.1 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 152.0 22.4926829268 676% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 674.0 112.824112599 597% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 152.0 22.9334400587 663% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 14.0 5.23603664747 267% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281549297333 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.281549297333 0.103423049105 272% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193896175183 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656992612489 0.0819641961636 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 75.4 13.2329268293 570% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -65.88 61.2550243902 -108% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 60.2 10.3012195122 584% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 9.6 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 13.25 8.06136585366 164% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 52.0 11.4329268293 455% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 62.8 10.9970731707 571% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 63.0 11.0658536585 569% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.