The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The diagram illustrates the process of recycling aluminum cans from the used one.

Overall, it is immediately obvious that there are seven prominent stages in this proceeding, initiating with collecting the aluminum cans at the garbage and cultivating in reusing the bottles.

At the first stage of the process, the jars which are used by the consumer are gathered in trash boxes, followed by transport to the manufacturer by trucks. The aluminum cans are cleaned, classified, shredded as well as compressed there. Following this is the heating and melting of the processed materials under high temperatures until they become liquid.

The next steps begin when the hot liquid aluminum is rolled, which its shape ranged from 2.5 mm to 6 mm thick, previously to be molded into the cans’ shape. Coming to the final stage of the proceeding, the recycled aluminum bottles are reused by the customers, which account for approximately third-fourth of total UK aluminum cans’ products.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-24 trpg143 67 view
2024-06-24 Zahid6400 78 view
2024-06-24 Zahid6400 73 view
2024-06-24 trpg143 67 view
2024-06-22 Zahid6400 67 view
Essays by user longtran :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, third, well, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29299363057 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83813536917 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.636942675159 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7078351555 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.714285714 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108678872277 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602209154723 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567427386612 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0853000016457 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655969238856 0.0819641961636 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.