The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The maps illustrate the transformation of an island before compared after the erection of some tourist amenities.
Overall, it is immediately obvious that the island witnesses radical changes with the most noticeable being the construction of numerous buildings in the central and west. Meanwhile, the east part of the island has the potential to develop due to its lack of facilities.
In the past, there was no way for visitors to visit this 100 meters-length island, whereas nowadays, they could reach here by boats through a pier constructed at the bottom. Regarding central, the fully-new reception could be reached by vehicle track leading to the restaurant in the North.
In terms of accommodations, they are built around the central area. The visitors can return to their home stays via footpath. Furthermore, they can walk to the swimming area, which is located in the westest. The island is also covered by few trees undergoing insignificant changes during the construction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | Mekata | view | |
| 2023-07-27 | teulimin.06 | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | lydia231232 | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | appollo abu | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Trịnh Trí Dũng | 84 | view |
- Too much emphasis is placed on testing these days The need to prepare for tests and examinations is a restriction on teachers and also exerts unnecessary pressure on young learners How far do you agree or disagree with this view 89
- H
- In order to study at university students are required to pay expensive tuition fees Not all students can afford them so some people think that university education should be free for everyone To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience You sh 82
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, regarding, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29113924051 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00704188752 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.696202531646 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7511847688 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8888888889 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126472672874 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475816384464 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750756569772 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930653480547 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919109509973 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.