Given is a flow chart revealing not only the way in which the simplest water filtration system is designed but also the process of producing clean drinkable water.
As can be seen from the diagram, it is clearly evidenced that there are numerous steps included in the process, beginning with pouring the initial impure water into one tank and ending up with the final potable water in another tank.
At the first stage, unclean water is put into a cylindrical barrel by removing its circular shaped lid. In this container there are three filtering layers namely sand, charcoal and gravel, with sand at the top and gravel at the bottom. The dirty water is then filtered through these three layers before being temporarily stored at the bottom of the tank.
The process continues with sucking up vertically the water gathered in bottom part of the tank by using an angled pipe. This pipe is slightly bent at the middle and also linked to another closed tank. Thus, filtered water from the first tank is easily brought into the second tank, which is placed lower than the first one. Lastly, filtered water is stored in a large container with a tap attached to it, through which the purified water is ready to be taken out for drinking.
- the chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used internet everyday from 2003-2006. 89
- In a global economy, many goods, including what we use on a daily basis, are transported from other countries in a long distance. To what extent do you think its benefits exceed its drawbacks? 89
- Some people think we should keep all the money we earn and not pay tax to the state. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 84
- Many people believe that today there is a general increase in anti social behaviour and lack of respect for others What might have caused this situarion How to improve it 82
- the diagram below shows a simple system that turns dirty water into clean water 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, lastly, second, so, then, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1022.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73148148148 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22135399706 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4353579554 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.555555556 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25041792692 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108897729256 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708880186974 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167436638028 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423718648732 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.