The diagram below shows time spent watching tv by age and gender in the UK in 1995 and 1999
The bar chart depicts comparison of hours spent by men and women if different age group watching TV in 1995 and 1999 in the United kingdom.
Overall, the graph depicts that the time spent watching television was higher as the age progresses. It also reveals that women spent more time watching television in 1999.
It is seen from the chart that both males and females between 4 and 15 years watched the television for around 17 hours in 1995 and in 1999. In the case of 16vto 24 year old, no significant change was seen in males as that stood around 17 hours but females showed a rise from 21 hours to 23 hours.
In addition, the age groups of 25-34 and 35-44 also showed a similar pattern where only women viewers spent more hours watching television. However, noticeable change were seen in 55 64 age groups. Men spent 27 hours but women spent 31 and 32 hours in 1995 and 1999 respectively. Lastly, men above 65 watched television for 3 hours more in 1999 from 33 the figure went to 36. However, women watched television for around 36 hours in both years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-23 | roadtoapro | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | roadtoapro | 78 | view |
| 2020-06-16 | karanbirsinghrandhawa | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-16 | karanbirsinghrandhawa | 81 | view |
| 2019-09-21 | Thang Tran | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010 92
- The diagram below shows time spent watching tv by age and gender in the UK in 1995 and 1999 61
- In many countries recently young people have been living far from their parents from the time they began studies or work until they married. Do you think there are more advantages or disadvantages of this trend? 67
- In many countries traditional foods are being replaced by international fast food which is having a negative effect on both family and societies. How far this statement is true use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 61
- In many countries traditional foods are being replaced by international fast food which is having a negative effect on both family and society. How far this statement is true use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, lastly, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50259067358 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3414415473 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507772020725 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1561121909 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.9 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282159111881 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137752388758 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810880182964 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20885481083 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796256136859 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.46 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.