The diagram below shows time spent watching TV by age and gender in the UK in 1995 and 1999.
Summerise the information by selecting the main features and make comparations where relevant.
The bar chart compares and contrast data on the changes in the amount of TV watched per week by men and women from different age groups over a five-year period from 1995 to 1999.
In general, more television is watched by both men and women of 65 years old and above than any other groups
More specifically, both sexes in the oldest group watched a little over 35 hours per week in 1999. By contrast, the 4- to 15-year-old girls in 1995 and their 16- to 24-year-old counterparts in 1999 watched the least with a little less than 17.5 hours each. The biggest difference between the two sexes in any age group was in the second youngest group where approximate 17.5 hours was recorded for females and a viewing time of a little over 22.5 hours for the opposite gender in 1999. The only two age groups wher both sexes experienced an increase in viewing time were for those viewers between 45 and 54 years of age and those between 55 and 64.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-21 | Thang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-21 | Thang Tran | 92 | view |
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 78
- The charts show the percentage of boys and girls aged 5 14 taking part in cultural activities and sports in Australia in 2003 78
- Research suggest that the majority of criminals who are sent to prison would commit crime when set free Why do you think is the case What can be done to solve this problem 67
- In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and I 78
- The table below gives information about the underground railway system in six cities 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 538, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o age groups wher both sexes experienced an increase in viewing time were for tho...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 776.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48554913295 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36060475508 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531791907514 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 27.7892065378 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.2 112.824112599 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.6 22.9334400587 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150223404623 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876811449932 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337366151045 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100516161025 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514125380582 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.35 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.