The diagram below shows time spent watching TV by age and gender in the UK in 1995 and 1999.
Summerise the information by selecting the main features and make comparations where relevant.
The bar chart compares and contrasts data on the correlation between the amount of time people spending watching TV per week and gender with age changing in the UK in 1995 and 1999.
A closer look at the diagram highlights the fact that the older people got, the more time they watched TV every week.
More specifically, at the tender age of 4 to 15, children only spent about 16 hours on TV. That tendency, however, seemed to experience a decrease for females compared to an increase for their counterparts in the second youngest age group. Women spent more time on TV than men did throughout the same period of time, except for children at the early age. The biggest difference for teenager age group was approximately 5 hours per week in 1999. The average hours per week elderly ladies from 65 years old spent watching TV was two times greater than that of girls from 4 to 15 years old in 1995. The highest figures for men and women from the 66 plus group was 33 hours and 35 hours, respectively, in 1995.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-21 | Thang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-21 | Thang Tran | 92 | view |
- The diagrams illustrate the design of a single and a double room study area 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 78
- It has been said that people who read for pleasure have more developed imaginations and better language skills than people who prefer to watch TV Do you agree or disagree 78
- The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012 78
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 302, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... on TV than men did throughout the same period of time, except for children at the early age. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 597, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...f girls from 4 to 15 years old in 1995. The highest figures for men and women from ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, second, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 835.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53804347826 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44933900848 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586956521739 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0434581065 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.375 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246568342969 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11214458735 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686027623483 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185337937225 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602675591012 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.