The diagram below shows the typical stages of consumer goods manufacturing, including the process by which information is fed back to earlier stages to enable adjustment.
The provided diagram illustrates stages of consumer goods production as well as feedback flows about the product.
The first stage begins with accumulating raw materials and manufactured components at a storage. A production planning field, which is the second stage, receives a design of a future product from a product research facility and necessary materials from the storage. The field also sends feedback to the storage if additional components are required. After the product has been planned, it is proceeded to assembly lines then the manufactured goods proceed to an inspection stage where several manufactured items are taken to a testing stage. At this stage the items are examined, then the results are sent to the design office. Afterward, if the goods are successful, they are delivered to a packaging field from where the products are shipped to stores to be sold. Stores are one of the most important stages since sales managers send feedback information to the product planning field and to a market research office which processes submitted information then also sends information to the design and advertisement offices.
The infographic indicates production of a good consists of several complex stages.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-09-29 | ralfs | 84 | view |
2019-06-24 | windingsilverfish | 78 | view |
2019-03-16 | Simranjot | 56 | view |
2018-12-30 | tahmeed1993 | 67 | view |
2018-10-02 | Paramdeepsingh | 56 | view |
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods. 67
- Nowadays food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live? 80
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views 56
- The diagram below shows the typical stages of consumer goods manufacturing, including the process by which information is fed back to earlier stages to enable adjustment. 73
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003-2012. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, then, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36787564767 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91246099691 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538860103627 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3710039895 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.111111111 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197122168649 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084095935118 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558508055227 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130648309168 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629020325946 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.