The diagram below so a small local museum and its surroundings in 1957 and 2007.
Presented in the maps is the transformation of a small local museum and it’s surroundings between 1957 and 2007
From an overall perspective, it is clear that this location witnessed significant change. Many rooms were added, while the trees were cut down over the period.
Looking more closely in the details, there were three rooms in the local museum namely national history exhibition, local history room and museum store-room in 1957. Moreover, surrounding the museum was a lot of trees, a garden behind it. It is noticeable that there was a road from the main road leaded to the entrance hall.
in the year 2007, one notable change is that almost trees was cut down, including the trees, along side the road. Furthermore, there was an appearance of a new room in the left of the old building and also tomorrow rooms will build in the back namely special exhibition and education center. In 2007 the café replace the museum star room which was moved to the new rooms in the left of the place. Also, the local history room was relocated to the national history room, replacing by the reception. The visitors can’t go to the entrance before going to the museum store.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it’s surroundings between 1957 and 2007 From an overall perspective, it is clear...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...main road leaded to the entrance hall. in the year 2007, one notable change is th...
^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: ALONG_SIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'alongside'?
Suggestion: alongside
...rees was cut down, including the trees, along side the road. Furthermore, there was an app...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79901960784 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49926459772 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544117647059 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1741269544 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207319894183 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861942875332 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897942088606 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179612079267 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.163444057106 0.0819641961636 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.