The diagram shows changes in Felistone in the UL between 1967 and 2001
The two maps give information about the changes in the layout of the British city of Felixstone between 1967 and 2001.
In general, the layout of Felixstone has significantly changed with additional services and the loss of several areas. The town changed to a sea tourism area.
Farmland was located behind the shop to the east of the High Street completely replaced and redeveloped by a new hotel, a swimming, and two tennis courts. Two large shops were on two sides of the road, and the golf course experienced no change.
The fish market on the other side of the road has also been replaced by a
private beach, while the marina pier near the shore opened in place of a public beach. The coffee shop and the hotel remained, and the dune reduced in size next to the new parking lot. Finally, near the seashore, a range of wind turbines was installed.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
2024-11-09 | Giang Tran | view | |
2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view |
- the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles
- In some countries many more people are chossing to live alone nowadays than in the peast Positive or negative development 84
- Some people believe that children should do organised activities in their free time while other think that children should be free to do what they want to do in their free time Discuss both view and give your opinion 73
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia 78
- The diagrams illustrate the process of building an igloo 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of the road has also been replaced by a private beach, while the marina pier nea...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 705.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60784313725 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4465231803 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614379084967 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.9005141354 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.125 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106870950445 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490636555102 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081624166641 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0681549657231 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0969828308548 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.