The charts show survey results concerning why MBA graduates chose their degree and employer’s reasons for hiring them.
The two pie charts give information about reasons people apply for an MBA degree and the factors potential employers target when hiring them in a particular survey.
Overall, it can be seen that having better job opportunities is the most common reason, while the percentage of ability to help other people is the lowest. Personality and previous experience knowledge accounted for the majority of employers' expectations.
Most students get an MBA to have a better employment rate, at 65% and 50% more than the figure for reasons about the ability to do a job better. 3% of students choose MBA to develop their skills rather than help others, with 12% and 8%, respectively.
Personality and previous experience relating to knowledge make up one-fourth of the total and are the highest percentage on the chart. It can be seen that experience connection and presentation appearance have the same patterns, at 20%. 10% is the percentage of qualification that employers value most and the lowest figure of all.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-16 | giangngoc | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-13 | longpham2k | 84 | view |
| 2022-02-20 | Awadhesh Mourya | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-29 | nanana1910 | view | |
| 2021-02-24 | phamkhuyen | 82 | view |
- With the development of the medica online there is no future for the radio To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 67
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from suagr cane 61
- The graph shows the amount of fossil fuel energy generated in Europe between 1981 and 2001 73
- With increasing populations and even growing urban centers many countries are losing their natural beauty spots What benefits are there to protecting places of natural beauty How can this be solved 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 846.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09638554217 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9264214524 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596385542169 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.1581727191 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.75 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.625 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22182514509 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892452035508 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937365104565 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14346711066 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106676790014 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.